The color of Jesus body, arms, feet likley a brownish shade but not upon return as the Two Witnesses

To continue a talk with a friend who has a “black” vehicle, an African American woman, who lives with a bunch of “white” catholics in a type of shared living circumstance, while she is a Buddhist, who has a blog that speaks to all sorts of justice issues, I wanted to share the ongoing research I do re: color of beings as depicted in the bible, so here is what I wrote to her, which by the way she is always appreciative of:

I just came across another scripture that speaks about the body and FEET of someone from the Kingdom of God as described by the prophet Daniel, from the book of Daniel that seems to be describing some aspects of “colour” of an “Older Member from the Level Above Human” that is the kind of non-gender and more specific evolutionarily speaking, thus more accurate description that Ti and Do uniquely delivered. (as juxtaposed by the “religious” terms that would be referred to as the Heavenly Father(s) or messenger(s) from the Kingdom of God in the literal heavens)

Two verses are deciphered here. Dan 10:6 refers to “colour”. But first the context:

Dan 10:5 Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a certain man clothed in linen, whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz:

“clothed in linen” is consistent with having a physical body. “loins girded” is consistent with how they restrained their reproductive activity as the loins were from the waist down and girded was wearing a belt (girdle). Saying it is “gold” has to do with their behavior being the most “pure” as in “refined by fire”, the result of having had experience on the human level restraining the fires of passion and sexuality that are natural to creatures/humans but not natural to those who have chose to be in a program to purge those mammalian characteristics from their consciousness and activity, the reason most all of the religions have lots of rules around sexuality and is thought that those who have become celibate in mind and body are more pure. (Except the practice has also become distracted as a religious practice that people who practice it are put on a pedestal, not knowing any longer to whom it is geared to give that passion in place of expending it on one another. The idea was to translate that “love” to ones “heavenly Father” as represented by the last incarnate member of the Next Level (which would be an “incarnate “son” of God”, a graduate of the human kingdom at a previous time, serving to show others the way, by incarnating. It’s likely that one or more of the 28 (to date) Buddhas were/would be depicting such a member of the Next Level providing that demonstration of behavior and ways that when applied to sets of souls that germinate and sprout over the course of the civilization’s “plantings” eventually qualify for harvest and then are rewarded with a body natural to the Level Above Human that has no human capacity to act as a mammal reproductively, or digestively or socially, as they have become a new creature that circulates in a new environment that is also physical though less limited physicality as then their physical bodies are truly like suites of clothing that have different tasks they are geared to perform. For instance Ti and Do said, one “vehicle” type could actually be a physical spacecraft to transport and help others on tasks, in which case that “soul body” (also has it’s frequency based density and is the power supply and thought mechanism of that person) becomes the “pilot” of their body, the same way we can become the sole pilot of these human bodies when we don’t just go with what the body wants but use our mind to determine when the body can have this or that pleasure, need, or activity. That is describing the “overcoming process” as then an incarnate Older Member is the one designing the program of what each student will enforce onto their own physical body so the Older Members will regulate the “pleasures”, down to how much sugar, etc., thus a student would be using their HOLY MIND (spirit) by doing what they instruct and thereby would be establishing that new programming to their own MIND making it more “HOLY” (the same mind of the Older members providing it), which is why Jesus said he was only saying what he was given to say by his Parent (Father) in the heavens (as the Father wasn’t incarnate).
It can look like robotics, but is no more robotic than when someone goes to school to learn a skill. Once they apply all the lessons, they have that skill, but if it’s not learned, then when it’s an intricate skill the person won’t get it, which brings me back to the idea of restraining of sexuality. One can learn the skill to do it and can get some benefit from it but if it’s not being accomplished FOR an Older Member, according to the instructions from the last one who was incarnate, that will be in stages, like having rules of who to have sex with (reproduce with) and when then it’s simply not interfacing with that Older members “program”, though it may be part of some other human or human equivalent (space alien, fallen angel, luciferian, shiva, etc. “god”, who was once in a program at one time but not only dropped out but went against their instructors (Older Members to try to keep humans under their command so they wouldn’t gravitate to the Next Level’s program as they tend to resent the Older Members because they gave into the lure as provided by the Next Level to give them free will to even be against them.

Dan 10:6 His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.

Hebrew – beryl = 08658 tarshiysh {tar-sheesh’}
probably of foreign derivation [compare 08659]; TWOT – 2546; n m
AV – beryl 7; 7
1) a precious stone or semi-precious gem 1a) perhaps a chrysolite, yellow jasper, or other yellow coloured stone

A more thorough perspective form Easton’s Bible Dictionary:

the rendering in the Authorized Version of the Hebrew word
_tarshish_, a precious stone; probably so called as being
brought from Tarshish. It was one of the stones on the
breastplate of the high priest (Ex. 28:20; R.V. marg.,
“chalcedony;” 39:13). The colour of the wheels in Ezekiel’s
vision was as the colour of a beryl stone (1:16; 10:9; R.V.,
“stone of Tarshish”). It is mentioned in Cant. 5:14; Dan. 10:6;
Rev. 21:20. In Ezek. 28:13 the LXX. render the word by
“chrysolite,” which the Jewish historian Josephus regards as its
proper translation. This also is the rendering given in the
Authorized Version in the margin. That was a gold-coloured gem,
the topaz of ancient authors.

Thus perhaps “gold coloured”.

Then “arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass”

colour = 5869
probably a primitive word; an eye (literally or figuratively); by analogy, a fountain (as the eye of the landscape):–affliction, outward appearance, + before, + think best, colour, conceit, + be content, countenance, + displease, eye((-brow), (-d), -sight), face, + favour, fountain, furrow (from the margin), X him, + humble, knowledge, look, (+ well), X me, open(-ly), + (not) please, presence, + regard, resemblance, sight, X thee, X them, + think, X us, well, X you(-rselves).

(Aramaic) corresponding to ‘`ayin’ (5869); an eye:–eye.

Brass = 05178 n {nekh-o’-sheth}
for 05154; TWOT – 1349a,1350a; n m
AV – brass 103, brasen 28, fetters 4, chain 3, copper 1, filthiness 1, steel 1; 141
1) copper, bronze 1a) copper (ore), bronze (as copper alloy) 1b) fetters (of copper or bronze) 1c) copper (as value) 2) lust, harlotry 2a) meaning dubious

which is an alloy of copper and zinc, was not known till the
thirteenth century. What is designated by this word in Scripture
is properly copper (Deut. 8:9). It was used for fetters (Judg.
16:21; 2 Kings 25:7), for pieces of armour (1 Sam. 17:5, 6), for
musical instruments (1 Chr. 15:19; 1 Cor. 13:1), and for money
(Matt. 10:9).

It is a symbol of insensibility and obstinacy in sin (Isa.
48:4; Jer. 6:28; Ezek. 22:18), and of strength (Ps. 107:16;
Micah 4:13).

The Macedonian empire is described as a kingdom of brass (Dan.
2:39). The “mountains of brass” Zechariah (6:1) speaks of have
been supposed to represent the immutable decrees of God.

The serpent of brass was made by Moses at the command of God
(Num. 21:4-9), and elevated on a pole, so that it might be seen
by all the people when wounded by the bite of the serpents that
were sent to them as a punishment for their murmurings against
God and against Moses. It was afterwards carried by the Jews
into Canaan, and preserved by them till the time of Hezekiah,
who caused it to be at length destroyed because it began to be
viewed by the people with superstitious reverence (2 Kings
18:4). (See NEHUSHTAN)

The brazen serpent is alluded to by our Lord in John 3:14, 15.

Before I close on this bit of evaluation, here is an overall colour view of bible use of color:

The subject of colours holds an important place in the

White occurs as the translation of various Hebrew words. It is
applied to milk (Gen. 49:12), manna (Ex. 16:31), snow (Isa.
1:18), horses (Zech. 1:8), raiment (Eccl. 9:8). Another Hebrew
word so rendered is applied to marble (Esther 1:6), and a
cognate word to the lily (Cant. 2:16). A different term, meaning
“dazzling,” is applied to the countenance (Cant. 5:10).

This colour was an emblem of purity and innocence (Mark 16:5;
John 20:12; Rev. 19:8, 14), of joy (Eccl. 9:8), and also of
victory (Zech. 6:3; Rev. 6:2). The hangings of the tabernacle
court (Ex. 27:9; 38:9), the coats, mitres, bonnets, and breeches
of the priests (Ex. 39:27,28), and the dress of the high priest
on the day of Atonement (Lev. 16:4,32), were white.

Black, applied to the hair (Lev. 13:31; Cant. 5:11), the
complexion (Cant. 1:5), and to horses (Zech. 6:2,6). The word
rendered “brown” in Gen. 30:32 (R.V., “black”) means properly
“scorched”, i.e., the colour produced by the influence of the
sun’s rays. “Black” in Job 30:30 means dirty, blackened by
sorrow and disease. The word is applied to a mourner’s robes
(Jer. 8:21; 14:2), to a clouded sky (1 Kings 18:45), to night
(Micah 3:6; Jer. 4:28), and to a brook rendered turbid by melted
snow (Job 6:16). It is used as symbolical of evil in Zech. 6:2,
6 and Rev. 6:5. It was the emblem of mourning, affliction,
calamity (Jer. 14:2; Lam. 4:8; 5:10).

Red, applied to blood (2 Kings 3;22), a heifer (Num. 19:2),
pottage of lentils (Gen. 25:30), a horse (Zech. 1:8), wine
(Prov. 23:31), the complexion (Gen. 25:25; Cant. 5:10). This
colour is symbolical of bloodshed (Zech. 6:2; Rev. 6:4; 12:3).

Purple, a colour obtained from the secretion of a species of
shell-fish (the Murex trunculus) which was found in the
Mediterranean, and particularly on the coasts of Phoenicia and
Asia Minor. The colouring matter in each separate shell-fish
amounted to only a single drop, and hence the great value of
this dye. Robes of this colour were worn by kings (Judg. 8:26)
and high officers (Esther 8:15). They were also worn by the
wealthy and luxurious (Jer. 10:9; Ezek. 27:7; Luke 16:19; Rev.
17:4). With this colour was associated the idea of royalty and
majesty (Judg. 8:26; Cant. 3:10; 7:5; Dan. 5:7, 16,29).

Blue. This colour was also procured from a species of
shell-fish, the chelzon of the Hebrews, and the Helix ianthina
of modern naturalists. The tint was emblematic of the sky, the
deep dark hue of the Eastern sky. This colour was used in the
same way as purple. The ribbon and fringe of the Hebrew dress
were of this colour (Num. 15:38). The loops of the curtains (Ex.
26:4), the lace of the high priest’s breastplate, the robe of
the ephod, and the lace on his mitre, were blue (Ex. 28:28, 31,

Scarlet, or Crimson. In Isa. 1:18 a Hebrew word is used which
denotes the worm or grub whence this dye was procured. In Gen.
38:28,30, the word so rendered means “to shine,” and expresses
the brilliancy of the colour. The small parasitic insects from
which this dye was obtained somewhat resembled the cochineal
which is found in Eastern countries. It is called by naturalists
Coccus ilics. The dye was procured from the female grub alone.
The only natural object to which this colour is applied in
Scripture is the lips, which are likened to a scarlet thread
(Cant. 4:3). Scarlet robes were worn by the rich and luxurious
(2 Sam. 1:24; Prov. 31:21; Jer. 4:30. Rev. 17:4). It was also
the hue of the warrior’s dress (Nah. 2:3; Isa. 9:5). The
Phoenicians excelled in the art of dyeing this colour (2 Chr.

These four colours–white, purple, blue, and scarlet–were
used in the textures of the tabernacle curtains (Ex. 26:1, 31,
36), and also in the high priest’s ephod, girdle, and
breastplate (Ex. 28:5, 6, 8, 15). Scarlet thread is mentioned in
connection with the rites of cleansing the leper (Lev. 14:4, 6,
51) and of burning the red heifer (Num. 19:6). It was a crimson
thread that Rahab was to bind on her window as a sign that she
was to be saved alive (Josh. 2:18; 6:25) when the city of
Jericho was taken.

Vermilion, the red sulphuret of mercury, or cinnabar; a colour
used for drawing the figures of idols on the walls of temples
(Ezek. 23:14), or for decorating the walls and beams of houses
(Jer. 22:14).

My Conclusion:

Now since this book of Daniel was dated well before Jesus, though later on in the chapters that follow this one that seem to be speaking to the same visit from this being, there are a number of indications of the “end days” and the depiction of the “Two” (witnesses?) at that time, but before that all sorts of depictions of armies conquering one another that others are better at sorting out but that often have historic correlations with non-biblical records. I would guess that if anything this being could have been the Older Member who later performed the task of Jesus as that was the purpose of the Old Testament Prophets (of which one can equate near to the 28 Buddhas curiously – (Do (doe) thought Buddist teachings of detachment from various forms of sensuality/human family and materialism was one sign of an overcoming process at some stage), to speak to the times and the behaviors, add certain updates to prophecies of the future, mostly pertaining to Jesus and thereafter depicting the activies of the “fallen angels” in control of humans.

Of course common sense says the physical body named Jesus was brown skinned as if he was “white” which is preposterous, but logically speaking as a strategy alone would have made him stand out so much that he never could have related and blended in to that society in order to deliver his radical information. He blended in well which is part of why they couldn’t catch him until he was ready to be caught.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: